Gas Prices Due To Al Gore and Global Warming Environmentalists says Weather Channel Founder

Weather Channel Founder Says Gas Prices due to Environmentalists and Global Warming LiesJohn Coleman is a very experienced meteorologist, in fact well known as a true pioneer in meteorology. He started the Weather Channel after all. If you believe in man made global warming, please take the time to read this logical explanation of how this global warming religion has taken over . . . and why environmentalists are responsible for the price of gas.

Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas
by John Coleman

You may want to give credit where credit is due to Al Gore and his global warming campaign the next time you fill your car with gasoline, because there is a direct connection between Global Warming and four dollar a gallon gas.

It is shocking, but true, to learn that the entire Global Warming frenzy is based on the environmentalist’s attack on fossil fuels, particularly gasoline. All this big time science, international meetings, thick research papers, dire threats for the future; all of it, comes down to their claim that the carbon dioxide in the exhaust from your car and in the smoke stacks from our power plants is destroying the climate of planet Earth. What an amazing fraud; what a scam.

The future of our civilization lies in the balance.

That’s the battle cry of the High Priest of Global Warming Al Gore and his fellow, agenda driven disciples as they predict a calamitous outcome from anthropogenic global warming. According to Mr. Gore the polar ice caps will collapse and melt and sea levels will rise 20 feet inundating the coastal cities making 100 million of us refugees. Vice President Gore tells us numerous Pacific islands will be totally submerged and uninhabitable. He tells us global warming will disrupt the circulation of the ocean waters, dramatically changing climates, throwing the world food supply into chaos. He tells us global warming will turn hurricanes into super storms, produce droughts, wipe out the polar bears and result in bleaching of coral reefs. He tells us tropical diseases will spread to mid latitudes and heat waves will kill tens of thousands. He preaches to us that we must change our lives and eliminate fossil fuels or face the dire consequences.

The future of our civilization is in the balance.

With a preacher’s zeal, Mr. Gore sets out to strike terror into us and our children and make us feel we are all complicit in the potential demise of the planet.

Here is my rebuttal.

There is no significant man made global warming. There has not been any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always changed. But mankind’s activities have not overwhelmed or significantly modified the natural forces.
Through all history, Earth has shifted between two basic climate regimes: ice ages and what paleoclimatologists call “Interglacial periods”. For the past 10 thousand years the Earth has been in an interglacial period. That might well be called nature’s global warming because what happens during an interglacial period is the Earth warms up, the glaciers melt and life flourishes. Clearly from our point of view, an interglacial period is greatly preferred to the deadly rigors of an ice age. Mr. Gore and his crowd would have us believe that the activities of man have overwhelmed nature during this interglacial period and are producing an unprecedented, out of control warming.

Well, it is simply not happening. Worldwide there was a significant natural warming trend in the 1980’s and 1990’s as a Solar cycle peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares. That ended in 1998 and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and the global temperatures have gone into decline. Earth has cooled for almost ten straight years. So, I ask Al Gore, where’s the global warming?
столовеmach zehnder modulator

Comments (1)

Dispute This - You Global Warming Preachers

This is a great read by Sherwood Thoele about global warming, or is it global cooling?

Thoele, of Fincastle, has been an analytical chemist for 32 years in the pharmaceutical and personal health care industries. He is also a mathematician.

Global cooling or global warming, which is it? It depends upon the latest climate study published.

In the 1960s and 1970s, they claimed global cooling because of several years of colder than “normal” temperatures.

Academia and certain think tanks claimed this cooling was from too much CO2 (carbon dioxide) in the atmosphere.

That died down and then came a warming spell, so we are now experiencing global warming, because of too much CO2 in the atmosphere.

So, too much CO2 causes both global cooling and global warming.

As an analytical chemist, I analyze all the parameters and data from studies: what prompted the study, who funded it, where it was conducted, measuring equipment accuracy and the atmospheric conditions or physical status of that area during the study.

Comments

Inconvenient Truth About Al Gore’s House Vs Bush

HOUSE #1:

A 20-room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house all heated by gas. In ONE MONTH ALONE this mansion consumes more energy than the average American household in an ENTIRE YEAR. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2,400.00 per month. In natural gas alone (which last time we checked was a fossil fuel), this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not in a northern or Midwestern “snow belt,” either. It’s in the South.

HOUSE #2:

Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university, this house incorporates every “green” feature current home construction can provide. The house contains only 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.) heats the house in winter and cools it in summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas, and it consumes 25% of the electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Flowers and shrubs native to the area blend the property into the surrounding rural landscape.

House #1 belongs to Al Gore…
House #2 belongs to George W Bush… An inconvenient truth indeed.

Comments

Stossel On the Al Gore Global Warming “Debate”

Finally a hero with shining armor comes to save the day for the major media, by actually asking questions, raising doubts and proving lies in the Al Gore movie An Inconvenient Truth.

It’s about time at least one show, on one network showed the facts against man-made global warming. John Stossel on 20/20 wisely ignored the “experts” who said the “debate is over.”

Comments

Weather Channel Founder Calls Global Warming a Scam

Weather Channel Founder Calls Global Warming a ScamIt is refreshing to hear from a “famous” person about the approach a lot of scientists, politicians and paid lobbyists have taken regarding global warming. Now this isn’t your normal everyday TV actor or movie star, this comes from the Founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman.

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM.

Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990’s to create an allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremist, notable politicians among them then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.

Now their ridicules manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.

I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party.

However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you “believe in.” It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won’t believe me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.

Read the rest of this entry

Comments

UK Court Rules Against Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth”

The Nobel Peace Prize people knew that Al Gore’s movie was full of lies and exaggerations, but still awarded him the worthless prize. One day prior to Al Gore receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, a court in the UK ruled that Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth” could not be used as valid teaching material in schools. The movie that the media refers to as a “documentary” has been distributed to every government school in the United Kingdom. The court ruled that the “documentary” is “political indoctrination.”

According to a released statement, the nine lies found by the Court in “An Inconvenient Truth” are:

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government’s expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.

• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.

• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one-off events to global warming.

• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that this was not the case.

• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr. Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.

• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant’s evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.

• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.

• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7 meters causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40 cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.

• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government is unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

If there is no dispute about global warming, then why does Al Gore need to blatantly lie and exaggerate to prove his point? Is he worried that the cyclical climate changes will return back to normal in a few years? Upon winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Al Gore said that he will use this to speed up measures to stop global warming. If the climate were to cool back down in a few years, and history has proven it will, Al Gore’s political cause will quickly die. This issue is the only reason anyone is talking about Al Gore, the only reason he is receiving donations and money from supporters, and the only reason he still has any importance in America. He is on a religious man hunt against capitalism, industry and the Republican Party. Lying and exaggerating is the only way he can prove his point.

Comments

Nobel Peace Price as Much a Joke as Global Warming

Al Gore Wins Nobel Peace Prize for Global WarmingAl Gore is on a roll. He won an Emmy, an Oscar and now the Nobel Peace Prize for his movie “An Inconvenient Truth.” The liberal media just loves him, and it’s now more apparent than ever that the Nobel Peace Prize is no more important than the Emmys or Oscars.

After all, this is the same organization that awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Jimmy Carter, Yasser Arafat and “Mister Food for Oil” UN Secretary-General Kofi Annon. Truly important people such as Gandhi and Ronald Reagan were never awarded the peace prize.

The Noble Peace Prize means nothing, but Al Gore and the global warming religion he has helped create will use this as another indisputable fact for the existence of global warming. It is disgusting that the media will take his exaggerated claims, and straight out lies, and promote them for the rest of the world to blindly believe. There are nine significant errors in “An Inconvenient Truth”, but you will never learn that on any major television network, newspaper or magazine. They want you to blindly believe their claims to gain more political control and therefore get more votes.

It is a scary time in America - the blind leading the blind.

Comments

Top Ten (well nine) Global Warming Lies

Here is another installment to our “Global Warming Basic Facts” category. Below you will find ten common beliefs about global warming and climate change. These are lies!

1. Carbon dioxide is a pollutant.

2. The twentieth century has been the hottest in recorded history and the decade 1990–2000 the hottest ever.

3. The evidence linking anthropogenic (man-made) carbon dioxide emissions and current warming is decisive.

4. The scientific consensus is that anthropogenic CO2 emissions have already caused significant global warming and must be severely curtailed to prevent future climate catastrophe.

5. Anthropogenic emissions of CO2 and the global warming caused thereby are responsible not only for higher temperatures and more droughts than in the past, but also for more blizzards, unseasonal snow, and freezing weather. They are also responsible for increasing numbers of cyclones.

6. Because of anthropogenic emissions, the polar ice caps are melting and sea levels are rising. The rising sea levels threaten low lying island states in the Pacific and Indian Oceans with complete inundation.

7. Unless anthropogenic emissions of CO2 are reduced by 50–60 per cent of current levels by the year 2050, by 2100 our descendants will have to endure global temperatures of between 1.4 to 5.8°C warmer than the present.

8. Tropical diseases such as malaria and dengue fever will spread from the tropics to the temperate regions.

9. Shutting down coal-fired power stations and replacing them with renewable energy sources such as windmills and solar panels (or even nuclear power plants) will not cause unemployment or economic deprivation.

Read the rest of this entry

Comments

Eating Meat Worse for Climate than Driving Car

PETA and the animal rights activists love the global warming goofballs, not only because they’re liberal loopys themselves, but it helps their agenda. And it’s true, according to a recent report from scientists in Japan. Producing 2.2 pounds of meat creates as much carbon dioxide as driving a car for three hours. Those quarter pounders add up pretty quick, and after a week worth of drive-thru eating, you could have caused less “harm” to the environment by driving all day and eating veggies.

“Taking into account all the processes involved, they said, four average sized steaks generated greenhouse gases with a warming potential equivalent to 80.25lb of carbon dioxide. This also consumed 169 mega joules of energy.

That means that 2.2lb of beef is responsible for greenhouse gas emissions which have the same effect as the carbon dioxide released by an ordinary car travelling at 50 miles per hour for 155 miles, a journey lasting three hours. The amount of energy consumed would light a 100-watt bulb for 20 days.

Most of the greenhouse gas emissions are in the form of methane released from the animals’ digestive systems, New Scientist magazine reported.”

So the methane from the cows causes most of the greenhouse gas emissions . . .

Maybe we should have called this website Global Warming Farts.

Comments

Global Warming Myths Video Part 3 - 5

Without further ado, here are the last three parts to the Global Warming Myths Video by Friends of Science.

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Stay tuned for more global warming video goodies that we’ll scour from the web.

Comments

Previous entries