The Nobel Peace Prize people knew that Al Gore’s movie was full of lies and exaggerations, but still awarded him the worthless prize. One day prior to Al Gore receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, a court in the UK ruled that Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth” could not be used as valid teaching material in schools. The movie that the media refers to as a “documentary” has been distributed to every government school in the United Kingdom. The court ruled that the “documentary” is “political indoctrination.”

According to a released statement, the nine lies found by the Court in “An Inconvenient Truth” are:

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government’s expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.

• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.

• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one-off events to global warming.

• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that this was not the case.

• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr. Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.

• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant’s evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.

• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.

• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7 meters causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40 cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.

• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government is unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

If there is no dispute about global warming, then why does Al Gore need to blatantly lie and exaggerate to prove his point? Is he worried that the cyclical climate changes will return back to normal in a few years? Upon winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Al Gore said that he will use this to speed up measures to stop global warming. If the climate were to cool back down in a few years, and history has proven it will, Al Gore’s political cause will quickly die. This issue is the only reason anyone is talking about Al Gore, the only reason he is receiving donations and money from supporters, and the only reason he still has any importance in America. He is on a religious man hunt against capitalism, industry and the Republican Party. Lying and exaggerating is the only way he can prove his point.